The Fall River School District believes that grading for learning provides the foundation for delivering accurate, meaningful and consistent grades that support mastery level of learning. All administrators and teachers will implement these principles with fidelity to establish district level practices and procedures related to grading.
GRADING FOR LEARNING VIDEO
GRADING FOR LEARNING PRINCIPLES
The mastery of defined learning targets instead of the accumulation of points
The reporting of student achievement toward meeting learning targets at a given time by reflecting on mounting evidence based on various forms of assessments
A record keeping system that provides teachers with information that allows them to adjust learning practices to meet the needs of students
A system that encourages student reflection and responsibility
The student’s grade more accurately represents the progress toward mastery of standards
Subject areas are subdivided into big ideas related to standards along with their respective learning targets
The improvement of student achievement of standards and learning targets in all content areas
The influence of positive and consistent work habits on student learning is reported separately from academics
PURPOSE & BELIEF
The purpose of grading in the Fall River School District is to communicate learning, growth, and achievement of our students in a consistent, practical and timely manner. In grading students, we will make informed instructional decisions to plan high quality, meaningful instruction for all students.
It is our belief that providing clear grading practices and procedures will lead to unbiased evaluation of student learning, growth, and achievement. The grades given reflect evidence of a student’s current level of academic performance in relation to specific standards. Grading practices will be clearly defined and communicated to all stakeholders.
GUIDELINES
Guidelines for Improving Accuracy:
Separate non-academic factors from grading
Eliminate the use of extra credit, behavior, attendance, participation, and other factors which misrepresent student performance in relation to the standards
Record grades which solely reflect individual student performance
Prioritize evidence trends of student learning
Avoid use of formative assessment evidence for grading
Guidelines for Making Grades More Meaningful:
Include specific feedback in relation to behaviors and non-academic skills (21st Century)
Provide feedback to students and parents in a timely manner
Organize grade books and report cards to a standards-based format
Provide a proficiency scale in advance- scale should be aligned to the standard
Guidelines for Improving Consistency:
Adopt and align practices to K-12 district-wide grading principles
Clearly define and communicate expectations in relation to the standards
Utilize descriptive proficiency scale
Guidelines that are Supportive of Learning:
Provide opportunities for students to improve their work and/or performance
Recognize new evidence of learning and discard old evidence
Eliminate punitive grading practices (penalties for late work)
Provide formative feedback and summative evaluation directly related to the standard
Refrain from grading students in comparison to one another
GRADING FOR LEARNING FAQ
